Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Respect Life

September 22, 2016 Leave a comment

Judith Di Matteo
Planned Parenthood Mid-Hudson Valley
3125 Rt. 9W, Suite 201
New Windsor, NY 12553
Planned Parenthood

August 26, 2016
Dear Ms. Di Matteo,
I apologize if I have caused you any inconvenience in my delayed response to your questionnaire. In reviewing your questions and choice of answers I find that I am unable to participate in the completion of the document. I am a firm believer in the Sanctity of Life, all life; human, animal and environmental. I abhor the continued devaluation of life in all instances. I believe the harvesting of the unborn is an unnatural and atrocious act. The dehumanization of living human babies by current terminology is morally deficient.
In my years of public service, I have witnessed the pain and suffering of women and families due to abortions. The model of loco parentis where by an “Agency” replaces “The Family” in making decisions regarding life and death is not beneficial to developing family structure and cohesiveness in our society. Respect for Life must be enhanced rather than diminished. The lack of “Respect for Life” is carried over to lack of respect for common decency, morality and civics. A return to a family unit with moral, ethical and educational values will contribute greatly to the reduction in unplanned pregnancies. The places where “The Village” has assumed the parental duties over children have failed. Those “Villages” have become centers of violence. I do not believe governments can replace parents and family units.
I have stated my personal beliefs and why they are not compatible with the philosophies of your organization. That said I will respect and abide by all existing law and statute. I will dedicate my efforts in public office to the wellbeing of the people who I serve. I appreciate your patience and diligence in soliciting my response.

Jack Hayes

Jack Hayes

24 Tinkers Lane Gardiner NY 12525

845 255 5152

Categories: Uncategorized

Smart Meter/ Cell Phone Radiation

September 22, 2016 Leave a comment

I attended the Stop Smart Meters Woodstock NY Forum at the Woodstock Library on September 10, 2016. Even though the room was warm and heavy with humidity there was a recognizable sense of purpose in the eyes of all who gathered together that evening. The ongoing Forum brought together people from all across the Hudson Valley region who share strong beliefs about protecting our environment. Weston Blelock was a gracious and able facilitator of the evening’s program, “Impacts of the 5G Spectrum Smart Phones” by Dafna Tachover.(Practicing Attorney at Law in New York and Israel, former Officer Israeli Defense Forces, )
Ms. Tachover, a victim of over exposure to Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity radiation related her experience. She clearly outlined the difficulty in tracing sources of pain and discomfort when said source is an invisible electronic wave. She identified the conflicting body of literature regarding the threat of Electromagnetic exposure. The fact that our Federal and State Governments seem to have partnered with the Wireless Industry is troubling. I am concerned that we the people have lost our thin layer of protection. There was a time when I may have been skeptical of Ms Tachover’s claims but a lifetime of manipulation by Corporate America has changed my perspective. As a veteran of the US Navy I served in the boiler room, I was exposed to extremely high levels of asbestos on a daily basis. I was able to buy cigarettes for ten cents a pack. My brother was in Vietnam and was exposed to Agent Orange. I saw my government deny the toxic effects of these exposers for decades as Veterans were denied medical treatment. I witness young men and women return from military service in the Middle East suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and overmedication. I listen to reports of their suicides and drug addiction and incarceration. We must be ever vigilant of whether our food has been genetically modified and if it is coming from countries that have laws protecting the quality of food. So yes I am a more skeptical person than I was fifty years ago and yes I appreciate people coming together like Weston Blelock , to protect other people who they have never met from Invisible Toxic Exposure. The Smart Meters Forum at Woodstock NY is a dedicated group of people who deserve more support from their elected officials. If I am chosen to be the NYS Assemblyman from District 103 I will work to insure the highest levels of safety and protection for all New Yorkers.

Jack Hayes
Gardiner, NY

Categories: Uncategorized

Anchorages on the Hudson River

September 22, 2016 Leave a comment

Ulster County Legislature Energy and Environment Committee Meeting August 8, 2016

Reference: Proposed United States Coast Guard Federally Designated Anchorage Grounds -Docket USCG-2016-0132, Hudson River

I attended the meeting of the Ulster County Legislature Energy and Environment Committee on August 8, 2016 Regarding the above subject. Two persons spoke to the subject;

Edward Kelly, Executive Director of the Maritime Association of the Port of New York/New Jersey and

John Lipscomb, Captain of the Riverkeeper

Remarks and observations;

I preface my remarks and observations of the presentations given at the committee meeting with my biographic subject matter expertise;
I served in the United States Navy from 1964 to 1968 in the rank of Petty Officer 2nd Class Boilerman, Non Commission Officer in charge of the Aft-fireroom, USS Zellars DD 777. During this enlistment I crewed one North Atlantic Ocean deployment, two deployments to the Mediterranean Sea, three deployments to the Caribbean Sea and numerous short voyages of Radar Picket Duty off the coast of the United States.
I served as a New York State Police Officer in Troop F which eastern boundary is the Hudson River with the Counties of Rockland, Orange, Ulster and Green abutting the Hudson River. I served as the Troop F Emergency Management Non Commissioner Officer and in that capacity was responsible for interfacing with federal, state and local jurisdictions in and for emergency responses. I was a member of the United States Coast Guard’s New York Harbor Working Group. I was a certified Hazardous Materials Technician and a New York State Office of Fire Prevention and Control and New York State Office of Emergency Management Instructor.

Summary of remarks by Mr. Edward Kelly
Mr. Kelly advised the committee that the USCG proposed anchorage sites were being created to address safety concerns related to vessel equipment malfunctions, ice jambs, fog and crew fatigue. (Note: he did not cite any specific emergency incidents that have occurred that would substantiate the creation anchorages to address the problem) He further referenced the historical use by right of commercial maritime access to the Hudson River. Mr. Kelly explained that the Hudson River Commercial corridor provided numerous high paying jobs for American workers and the essential supply of various types of petroleum products needed in the Hudson Valley. He advised maritime conveyance was the lowest cost and highest safety transportation modality. In referencing apparent concerns of persons filing comments with the Coast Guard on the Anchorage Proposal, Mr. Kelly;
dismissed the subject of “View Shed” as the river having always contained commercial vessels and traffic. He mentioned that people who live near an airport should expect to see planes.
He similarly spoke to noise and lighting pollution concerns as being part of commerce and being regulated by the United States Coast Guard.
He mentioned that the discharge of polluted liquids is also regulated and enforced by the USCG.
(Note; In my experience the USCG has very limited resources assigned to monitor violations of transient commercial vessel pollution violations. On several occasions when I, as a New York State Trooper, attempted to report commercial vessels discharging liquid into the Hudson River, I was told there were no USCG enforcement patrols in the area. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Police have limited response capability in the warm weather seasons for such violations. Commercial vessels are rarely charged with “Liquid Discharge Violations” as it very difficult to prove a case. Ship Captains and Railroad Train Engineers have very significant power and authority and are not easily subject to local law.)

Mr. Kelly mentioned that he had heard the Hudson Valley was subject to severe cold weather and snow and that the residents would not want their supply of heating fuel interrupted during such times.
(Note: I do not understand the inference of a possible shortage of petroleum product if additional anchorages are not established. To date maritime traffic on the Hudson River has not impacted petroleum supply to the Hudson Valley that I am aware of. To link a supposed “Safety Proposal” to supply of essential petroleum product is unusual. The tenor of the remark smacks of a veiled threat of “No anchorages , No heating fuel”. )

With regard to response to Hazardous Materials releases, Mr. Kelly offered the admonition of “Shame on them” to communities that were not prepared to provide a comprehensive response to a Maritime Hazardous Materials Incident.
(Note; there is limited Maritime Spill/Hazardous Materials Release response municipal capability outside the New York City metropolitan area. Most suburban and rural communities are served by volunteer fire departments. Some volunteer fire departments which border the Hudson River have personnel rescue equipment for boating accidents. I do not know of any fire department that has vessels and equipment to respond to a major maritime hazardous material release. Releases on the Hudson River would require commercial environmental companies to respond. The trucking Industry of the United States shifted enormous Hazardous Material Release clean up responsibility on local fire departments in the early 1990’s. It took years to reestablish responsibility to the industry. Adding financial, training and logistical stressors to volunteer fire departments is unacceptable. )

Mr. Kelly noted that there was in fact an increase in the Sturgeon population in areas near anchorages. (Note; no documentation was provided)

Summary of remarks by John Lipscomb, Captain of the Riverkeeper

Captain Lipscomb commenced by stating the need for additional anchorages begins to be realized in the year 2012 when Bakken Crude oil began arriving at Albany NY. He advised that since 2012 the volume crude oil moved through Port of Albany has increased enormously (note;he mentioned very staggering figure but I was unable to capture the exact amounts and will add that information when it can be vetted). Captain Lipscomb maintains that the need for anchorages is actually a need for Staging locations due to the enormous volume in oil moved. The Captain also advised that Emergency Anchorages have always been granted for need and thus the “Safety Issue” is more a “Staging Issue” created by an increase in commerce. He noted that that political leaders in both the City of Albany and New York State were aware of the increased volume of maritime traffic due to the increase in oil movement. Captain Lipscomb stated that there was insufficient study on the effect of anchorages on the Sturgeon population. Captain Lipscomb offered no substantiation of any perceived need for greater safety measures on the Hudson River Corridor.

Conclusions ;
The case was not made for a safety need of increased anchorages. No documentation of safety related incidents were provided.

Anchorages will invariably produce pollution and the USCG is not presently equipped to provide oversight

Baseline monitoring of proposed anchorage sites needs to be conducted to be able to ascertain any change in levels of pollution and the point of origin should additional site be approved.

There is an enormous need to extend the comment period. There is so much clarification that needs to be done.

New York State and United States Representatives must contribute to the assessment of impacts on environment and emergency response capabilities. There are enormous economic and technical issues involved in the consideration of expanded commercialization of the Hudson River Corridor which are above and beyond the average citizen’s scope of knowledge and proficiency. Those who have access to the resources need to evaluate this proposal to protect the people of New York State.


Will foreign vessels arrive in the Hudson River and will they have been screened/inspected in New York City or prior to Hudson River Anchorages? Are we creating security issues? Will foreign flag ships be inspected for passenger and crew Terrorist Watch List clearance ? Will vessels be inspected for health related criteria (virus)?

Will the United States Coast Guard increase oversight of anchorages if they are approved? At the current time the inspection of temporary anchored vessels is all but nonexistent.

Will Marine Hazardous Materials Release Response capability be initiated in the newly designated anchorage corridor.

Will pollution monitoring be initiated in a manner conducive to identifying and prosecuting polluters? Will anchorages be tested for pollution? How often? After each anchorage to assign source of contamination if needed?

Will there be a Central Control Point which approves and monitors anchorage permission and duration?

Has New York State Office of Emergency Management or the Federal Emergency Management Agency commented on the capability of Emergency Responders to address a major incident in the Upper Hudson River?

What is the economic advantage to crew and vessel managers like Pilots to layovers at anchorages $? What is the salary of Crews and Pilots?

Remarks ;

In my experience as an Emergency Manager/Responder I have found the corporate entities of Railroads, Airlines and Maritime services to be very autonomous and at times difficult to interact with. Maritime in particular is insulated and isolated from local jurisdiction by the physical body of water in which they ply their trade. National and international rules and laws complicate matters of jurisdiction, compliance and recompense. My experience as a seaman enables me to reference acceptable practice in inland waterways. There needs to be an immediate withdrawal of the Proposed expansion of Hudson River Anchorages and a consortium of local, State and Federal representatives need to convene to address this matter. There must be a cessation of any and all artificial time limits. This appears to be corporate power bullying at its worst and I am disappointed that those representatives who are entrusted to protect and preserve the public good have not acted decisively to date.

Jack Hayes
24 Tinkers Lane
Gardiner, NY 12525
845 255 5152

Categories: Uncategorized

John J. Hayes for NYS Assembly district 103

Jack is the Conservative Party candidate for the NYS Assembly district 103.

Thank You for Your Support

Categories: Uncategorized

OSHA cites The Renaissance Project in Ellenville

April 10, 2011 Leave a comment
From: Fitzgerald, Edmund - OPA [mailto:fitzgerald.edmund@DOL.GOV] 
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:47 AM
Subject: US Labor Department's OSHA cites The Renaissance Project in
Ellenville, NY, for inadequate workplace violence safeguards following
worker's death

News Release    Connect with DOL at!

U.S. Department of Labor        For Immediate Release           April 7,
Office of Public Affairs
Contact:  Ted Fitzgerald 
Boston, Mass.                                                   Phone:
Release Number: 11-468-NEW/BOS 2011-126                 E-mail: 


US Labor Department's OSHA cites The Renaissance Project in Ellenville, NY,
for inadequate workplace violence safeguards following worker's death

Treatment facility also cited for record-keeping and bloodborne hazards

ALBANY, N.Y.  - The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and
Health Administration has cited The Renaissance Project Inc. in Ellenville
for failing to provide its employees with adequate safeguards against
workplace violence as well as other alleged hazards. OSHA initiated an
investigation in October 2010 following the death of one employee and the
wounding of another, allegedly committed by a client at the addiction
treatment facility.

OSHA's investigation found that the employer had not developed or
implemented adequate measures to protect its staff from physical assaults
nor had it provided training to staff to advise them on how to respond in
the event of an actual or threatened physical assault.

As a result, OSHA has cited the facility with a serious violation of the
agency's general duty clause for failing to provide a workplace free from
recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious injury. A serious
violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious
physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or
should have known.

"This citation points to the clear and pressing need for The Renaissance
Project and similar facilities to develop a comprehensive program that will
proactively address workplace violence situations that imperil the safety
and health of their workers," said Edward Jerome, OSHA's area director in

This serious citation includes a number of suggested means of abatement that
the facility can pursue to address the workplace violence issue. These

*        Conduct an annual, site-specific workplace violence hazard analysis
to identify hazards, conditions, operations and situations that could lead
to violence, and address and correct any identified deficiencies.
*        Evaluate the staff communication log to identify clients that
exhibit violent behavior and incorporate measures that reduce the likelihood
of clients committing violence in the workplace.
*        Develop and train employees in an emergency communication program.
*        Develop and implement engineering and administrative controls to
reduce workplace violence hazards.
*        Ensure that a sufficient security presence and/or personnel are on
facility floors at all times. 
*        Establish open communication between security and other employees to
help identify problematic clients and situations that could result in an
*         Train security personnel in crisis intervention, and workplace
violence prevention policies and programs.


OSHA also has issued four additional serious citations to The Renaissance
Project for the lack of a written exposure control plan and training for
employees with occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens; failing to
offer the Hepatitis B vaccine to such employees; and for not having a
written hazard communication program.

Additionally, the facility has been issued two other-than-serious citations
for not maintaining illness and injury logs for 2010, and not notifying OSHA
of the worker fatality within eight hours.  An other-than-serious violation
is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably
would not cause death or serious physical harm. The Renaissance Project
faces a total of $28,000 in proposed fines.

The Renaissance Project has 15 business days from receipt of its citations
and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA's area director or contest
the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission. The investigation was conducted by OSHA's Albany Area Office;
telephone 518-464-4338. 

OSHA's "Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Health Care &
Social Service Workers" is available online at  Additional
information on workplace violence is available at

To report workplace incidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent
danger to workers, call OSHA's toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742).

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are
responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees.
OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and
women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education
and assistance. For more information, visit

# # #

U.S. Department of Labor news materials are accessible at
<>  The information above is available
in large print, Braille, audio tape or disc from the COAST office upon
request by calling 202-693-7828 or TTY 202-693-7755.  

Categories: Uncategorized

Morning Bell: Funding the Right Force to Protect America

April 10, 2011 Leave a comment
Morning Bell: Funding the Right Force to Protect America

Posted By Mike Brownfield On 04/07/2011 @ 09:26 am in Protect
America | 0 Comment(s)

A battle continues to rage in Washington over the 2011 federal
budget, and a long-term war on how to cut the $14.3 trillion
dollar deficit is about to begin. But as political opponents spar
over spending, the United States military is waging a real war in
Afghanistan, helping to stabilize Iraq, conducting operations
across the globe from Libya to Yemen, Haiti to Somalia, and
providing assistance to Japan following its natural disaster.
With the prospect of a government shutdown looming, some in
Congress have rightly devoted special attention to ensuring our
military remains fully funded in the short term. But as the
debate begins over the 2012 budget and beyond, both Congress and
the White House must field the right military force to protect
America today and into the future.

From welfare to Social Security, stimulus spending to Obamacare,
big government politicians have charted a course of bigger
spending, all on the American taxpayer's dime. Some of these
actions are unquestionably unconstitutional and are putting the
squeeze on other national priorities. Chief among those
priorities is the federal government's obligation, set forth in
the U.S. Constitution, to keep America safe. You don't have to
look any further than the Preamble to see that the purpose of the
government is to "provide for the common defense." It is a duty
that stands apart from all others and that is superior to any
other it has. Yet some politicians put our military on the
chopping block as they look to cut spending, regardless of the
force requirements that must be met in order to protect America.
That's no way to fulfill a constitutional obligation to defend a

Defending the country is not simply about dollars and cents. It's
about having the forces the military needs to confront the
challenges the United States faces around the world. A new
report by The Heritage Foundation outlines the dangers U.S.
military forces must confront in our homeland, Asia, Europe, the
Middle East and space, describes what forces are required and how
much they will cost – averaging $720 billion per year from FY
2012-2016. To put that in perspective, despite our military's
global obligations, defense spending ranks fourth in overall
government spending priorities, falling behind the combined cost
of Social Security and Medicare, public education and
means-tested welfare. It's less than one-fifth of federal
spending and falling.

Given the state of our military, that's a dangerous prospect. Two
decades of neglect have left us with rapidly aging ships, planes
and vehicles; we have the smallest Navy since 1916, and many of
today's tanker and bomber pilots are flying in airplanes first
used by their grandfathers in Vietnam. Heritage's Mackenzie
Eaglen writes:
A decade of combat operations and two decades of underinvestment
have left the U.S. military too small and inadequately equipped
to meet all of the growing demands placed upon men and women in

Last summer, a bipartisan commission warned of a coming "train
wreck" if Congress does not act quickly to rebuild and modernize
the U.S. military. To meet tomorrow’s needs, the tools of
national security must be strengthened quickly for the U.S. to
help to stabilize the international environment and keep U.S.
citizens safe and free while ensuring that America’s economy
can prosper and grow.
A fully funded, modern military is necessary to manage complex
and far-ranging regional threats. Heritage's study highlights hot
spots where U.S. interests are threatened. In Asia, China's
military buildup and advanced technology jeopardize America's
ability to project power in the western Pacific. U.S. operations
continue in Afghanistan and Pakistan, but al-Qaeda is attempting
to move into Yemen and beyond. With North Korea and Iran
continuing to pursue ballistic missile and nuclear programs, they
too are significant threats, and Europe faces risks on its
eastern borders, all while Turkey drifts toward a more Islamic
foreign policy.

Our homeland depends on a strong military, as well. Natural
disasters, like the earthquake that struck Japan, would require
military resources as would man-made catastrophes, terrorist
attacks, cyber security, border security and transnational
criminal cartels. With our military's current obligations abroad,
it's questionable whether it could adequately respond to a
catastrophe at home.

Heritage's James Carafano, Mackenzie Eaglen and Baker Spring
Reducing U.S. forces below strategic requirements also presents
grave risks to U.S. prosperity and economic growth. The
military's reliability has reassured allies and deterred
potential adversaries from aggression. If the U.S. lacks the
capacity to protect its vital interests, both the security and
economy of the nation will suffer in the long term.
As commander-in-chief, President Barack Obama should know better
than anyone that our military is of primary importance to
securing America's interests at home and abroad. But in his 2012
budget request, he fails to adequately fund our military and its
mission. With the battle over this year's budget hopefully coming
to a close and the war over long-term spending about to begin,
the president and Congress would be wise to remember that the
government over which they preside has a fundamental obligation
to the people they represent: providing for the common defense.
It's time they make it a priority to get that job done.

Quick Hits:

* The stalemate over the budget continues after President Obama,
Speaker Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Reid failed last night
to reach an agreement to fund the government through the end of
FY 2011.
* As rain falls in South Korea, dozens of schools there closed
Thursday over fears of radioactive fallout from Japan's nuclear
disaster. Meanwhile, Japan is considering a wider nuclear
evacuation zone.
* Libyan rebels claim that NATO air strikes near the oil port of
Brega hit their forces. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Clintonmet
with Italy's Franco Frattini yesterday to discuss how to "do
more to help the opposition make very fast progress."
* Oil prices have neared $109 a barrel amid the fighting in Libya
and unrest in the Middle East. Regular unleaded gasoline in the
United States is up 23 percent from one year ago.
* The European Central Bank raised interest rates for the first
time since 2008 in order to stem the tide of rising energy and
food prices.

Article printed from The Foundry:

URL to article:

URLs in this post:

\r\n[1] ensuring our military remains fully funded:\r\n[2]
A new report:\r\n[3]
bipartisan commission:\r\n[5]
he fails to adequately fund:\r\n[7]
stalemate over the budget continues:\r\n[8]
wider nuclear evacuation zone:\r\n[9]
met with Italy's Franco Frattini:\r\n[11]
neared $109 a barrel:\r\n[12]
raised interest rates for the first time since 2008:

You are subscribed to this newsletter as

If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters or
opt out of this newsletter please click below to update your
subscription preferences.

You are subscribed to this newsletter as 

If you want to receive other Heritage Foundation newsletters or
opt out of this newsletter please click here to update your
subscription preferences.
Categories: Uncategorized